Pretty cool. Oakland-based photographer Noah Beil is putting together small run photobooks he makes by hand with letter press printing press and a home binder. Great looking output. Twenty bucks, edition of 50. You can buy online and he’s got pictures of the production process. Great stuff.
Lay Flat #2 Available for Preorder
January 21st, 2010 § 0 comments
The second issue, if that’s what you can call it, of Shane Lavalette’s publishing experiment “Lay Flat” is now available for pre-ordering. The thing ships in late February. Photographers this time around include: Claudia Angelmaier, Semâ Bekirovic, Charles Benton, Walead Beshty, Lucas Blalock, Talia Chetrit, Anne Collier, Natalie Czech, Jessica Eaton, Roe Ethridge, Stephen Gill, Daniel Gordon, David Haxton, Matt Keegan, Elad Lassry, Katja Mater, Laurel Nakadate, Lisa Oppenheim, Torbjørn Rødland, Noel Rodo-Vankeulen, Joachim Schmid, Penelope Umbrico, Useful Photography, Charlie White, Ann Woo and Mark Wyse. Whew! A long list and I don’t recognize a single name, which is exciting, actually.
Some writing about photography, too. Runs you thirty bucks.
Open Call for Photographs Honoring Larry Sultan at CCA
January 11th, 2010 § 0 comments
I’m still waaay behind on my blog reading from the holidays and taking care of moving my family from Colorado to the Bay Area. Ran across this today, a mass show of photography to honor the passing of Larry Sultan who taught at California College of the Arts here. Sultan’s “The Valley” is one of the most powerful projects I’ve seen. If you’d like to contribute, here are the details. More on Conscientious.
Here are the three ways you can contribute:
1. Mail something that will arrive by Wednesday January 14th at the latest, sooner is better.
If you want your contribution returned to you please provide a SASE. Please include your name and an email address and/or phone number with your submission.
Photography Program c/o Chris Nickel
California College of the Arts
5212 Broadway
Oakland CA 94618-14262. Email something to be part of the projection slide-show to photo@cca.edu
Please include your name and an email address and/or phone number with your submission.
Please send jpegs sized at 72dpi and no larger than 1500 dpi.3. If you live in the Bay Area, drop off something to the first floor of the photo building (Martinez) on the Oakland campus anytime between 10am-5pm from January 7th through January 14th (with the exception of Saturday the 9th and Sunday the 10th). Please include your name and an email address and/or phone number with your submission. Please return to pick up your submission at the Oliver Art Center on Monday January 18th between 10am-1pm.
Tweetchat tonight: Best of 2009
December 29th, 2009 § 0 comments
Photo art chat on Twitter continues to be a great way to “meet” new people passionate about photography. Last week’s chat with Radius Books founder Darius Himes gave an inside view on the challenges and rewards of photo book publishing. This week, we’re going to tackle your views of the best of 2009. Galleries, museums, boools and new photographers. Harlan Erskine will be hosting once again.
Tonight’s tweetchat starts at 6pm Pacific (9pm Eastern). The Tweetchat site is a great way to follow the discussion.
Follow Ocular Octopus on Twitter
Follow Harlan Erskine on Twitter
Tweetchat Tonight with Darius Himes
December 22nd, 2009 § 0 comments
Lat week’s tweetchat (#photoartchat) was a lot of fun. Most of the conversation centered print-on-demand book projects. This week, we’re going to continue talking about photobooks, but move onto other aspects. Harlan Erskine has lined up a special guest, Darius Himes, one of the founders of Radius Books. If you’re not familiar with Darius, here’s an interview over at A Photo Editor.
Tonight’s tweetchat starts at 6pm Pacific (9pm Eastern). I found using the Tweetchat site useful for following the discussion.
Follow Ocular Octopus on Twitter
Follow Harlan Erskine on Twitter
Follow Darius Himes on Twitter
Chat About “Future of the Photobook” Dec 15 on Twitter
December 14th, 2009 § 1 comment
On Tuesday evening (tomorrow), I’ll be joining photographer Harlan Erskine for a Twitter-based chat about the future of the photobook. We’ll be online to talk all things photobook from 9-10pm Eastern/6-7pm Pacific. This is the first time we’ve tried something like this, so it’ll be a little experimental. You can use hashtag #photoartchat on Twitter to read or participate in the chat. I’m planning to use Tweetchat.com to make this a little easier.
And, of course, you should follow OcularOctopus on Twitter, here.
UPDATE: There is a transcript of the chat at the #photoartchat page.
The Photobook Circa 2019
December 13th, 2009 § 4 comments
Livebooks is running a “distributed blog post” on the future of the photobook. Specifically, “What do you think photobooks will look like in 10 years? Will they be digital or physical? Open-source or proprietary? Will they be read on a Kindle or an iPhone? And what aesthetic innovations will have transformed them?” My take:
What do I think the photobook will look like in 10 years? Probably very much like photobooks do now. “Photobook” is a broad category and if you look at other broad categories over time, they don’t change a lot. Think about movies you’ve seen that predicted what the future would be like when the future was now. Instead of radical changes to cars, television, clothing as it turns out everything in the broadest sense is very much like it was in the 1930s, 1940s and 1950s. Cars have a driver, carry roughly a handful of people, run on wheels and drive on roads. In the same sense, 10 years from now photobooks will look and function much as they do now: a cover wrapped around a sequence of reproduced photographs in color or black and white with or without accompanying text pieces.
Specifics, of course, will change, particularly in production and economics. On-demand printing technology is going to get much, much better. Combined with advances in digital photography, we’ll see a level of self-publishing quality that is going to blow our minds. Think about what a point-and-shoot camera was in 2000 and look at how that’s advanced in 10 years. I’d expect medium-format film quality consumer level digital cameras by the end the next decade. And the physical printing quality of on-demand publishers is going to advance along side camera technology to offer a final product that would be cost prohibitive even for a dedicated publisher today.
The upshot of advancing technology will be a radical increase in the volume of works available. I don’t think, however, that will likewise translate to a corresponding increase on the consumption side. If you look at the decline and eventual disappearance of the long-form photo essay in the picture magazines such as Life, the wider public has sadly lost its patience for such work. So the general audience for photobooks will continue to be a niche one, aside from vaniety audiences looking at a specific photographers work – ie family and friends.
Paper-based photobooks have been a core photographic object since the dawn of paper negatives (Fox Talbot’s “Pencil of Nature” was a sheaf of tipped-in photographs bound together) and I don’t see that changing or going away. WIll people look at photos on a Kindle or iPhone like device? Sure. (I don’t think such devices circa 2019 will look or function much like what we see today, which are embryonic forms of something that will converge and get physically bigger.) I think its more likely that people will view art and photography on their $200 60″ hi def TV or computer screen than on a mobile device.
The open source/proprietary question misunderstands or misappropriates the concept of “open source”. Open source in software arises from the idea that computer programs are a result of logic and pure thought, that anyone gven the time and expertise could arive at a computer program just as one would the laws of physics. Therefore, they can not be owned. In the strictest way, photography is already open source in that the subject and light are, in most cases, freely available to everyone to make their own photographs. But it is the naive view that simply given the raw ingredients and proper compass headings and coordinates would reproduce a given photograph. The photographer is an author, expressing individual creativity, not a mathematician solving a formula.
Nevertheless, the sheer volume of photographs (we haven’t seen nothin’ yet) will challenge the ability of the photographer to maintain his/her rights over a particular expression. In this, the photobook may be more important than ever to establish the artistic intent of the photograph as an object and not merely an idea.
UPDATE: Many, many others have also weighed in on this question, all collected at Resolve, the liveBooks blog. Some favorites of mine, so far:
- Elizabeth Avedon with terrific photos of Richard Avedon’s “Portraits” book mock-up
- Darius Himes
- Alec Soth, which also informally announces his book publishing effort, Little Brown Mushroom
- Food For Your Eyes
- Shooting Wide Open
Top 20 Photobooks of 2009 from 5B4
December 9th, 2009 § 0 comments
Some pretty esoteric stuff from my perspective, but 5B4 has posted its (his?) top twenty photo books of the year. I only recognize a few names, but always love being introduced to new work.
Day Trip to LA for “New Topographics”
December 7th, 2009 § 1 comment
This past Saturday I took advantage of accumulated frequent flyer miles and an open weekend to fly down to Los Angeles and see “New Topographics” at LACMA.
As a Westerner and a landscape photographer, the artists who took part in New Topographics, particularly Robert Adams and Frank Gohlke, are the most influential in my own approach to making pictures. I had to make the pilgrimage. (Though just hours after I made airline reservations, I discovered SFMOMA will be hosting the show next summer. Oh, well.)
The show as it is re-presented contains about 2/3 of the original works. All the original photographers are present, save Stephen Shore. The show also contains works by Ed Ruscha, though this work is intended to provide context and was not part of the original 1975 show at George Eastman House in Rochester, NY.

Untitled View (Albuquerque), 1974, Joe Deal
I has seen work from Adams, Shore, Wessel, and Nixon previously, though not necessarily these specific pieces. Joe Deal and John Schott were new to me. Deal particularly made an impression. While almost all the others had to make a way to deal with broad expanses of sky so common in the West, Deal made a conscious decision to drive it from his work. Each of his photographs is taken from a high vantage point looking down, cutting the horizon out and filling the frame with a scrub brush dotted landscape. This is a highly unusual perspective, one that deliberately avoids mimicing our own perspective as a pedestrian. As Frank Gohlke has said, Deal’s work alone was truly “topographical”.

El Nido Motel, 1973, John Schott
Schott’s work is a series of road side motels taken during a road trip on Route 66, which was already falling into disuse at the time he traveled it. Initially, Schott says, he attempted to mimick Ansel Adams’ and Edward Weston’s nature photography. But somewhere along the road he began to make pictures of the odd little road side motels. Several here are mock adobe pueblos, some neon-lit. Gohlke, too, has said his initial experiments with photography were more along traditional lines, particularly in his youth as a member of a camera club. I guess we all start that way. Emulating what is familiar.
The Becher’s work here was unusual, at least to me. Even though I own one of their books, I was surprised to see several of their familiar grids were not the well-known multiples of architechtural types, but multiple views of the same structure taken from a variety of angles, circumnavigating the building. Listening to Hilla Becher talk about the evolution of their working method was good for building my own working patterns and understanding that practice is just that, practice, and a working style doesn’t arrive fully formed like Athena from the head of Zeus.
Each photographers is represented by a audio clip you can access from the show by cellphone. The clips, one each from the represented photographers, run a minute or two each. (The LACMA blog talks about selecting the clips. )I loved being able to listen to each one speak as I walked the gallery floor and examined each of their images. You can hear them, too:
Call 1-866-397-1047 and enter the code corresponding with each photographer:
- Robert Adams: 10 #
- Frank Gohlke: 14 #
- Nicholas Nixon: 15 #
- Henry Wessel Jr: 18 #
- Lewis Baltz: 11 #
- Joe Deal: 13 #
- John Schott: 16 #
- Hilla Becher: 12 #
Through January 3, 2010 at LA County Museum of Art
5905 Wilshire Blvd
Los Angeles, CA
(323) 857-6000
Next Sunday at 2pm, photographer Catherine Opie will be giving a gallery talk. I was surprised there was not a reprint of the original show catalog available. A new edition will be published by Steidl.
UPDATE: Horses Think’s post on this points out the audio is available on the LACMA Web site. It includes Stephen Shore, which makes me think perhaps I missed a room of photos?
Blind Spot Benefit Auction, Dec 15
December 7th, 2009 § 0 comments
Blind Spot’s benefit auction is coming up Dec. 15th. It’ll be held at X Initiative in NYC. The online auction is up now for viewing and bidding. If you want to go in person, you’ve got to be on the guest list (unlike some other high profile events. Ahem.) Tickets range from $25 to $150 to admit two. Even if you’re not bidding, it’s worth perusing the photographs being offered. Lot’s of interesting images from artists well-known and lesser-known.
Blind Spot Benefit Auction
Dec. 15th at X Initiative
548 West 22nd Street NYC 10011